Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  171 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 171 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

169

35.2.2 Subsidiaries

35.2.2.1 During 2009, the subsidiary was claimed in

a civil lawsuit, as joint defendant together with other individuals

and juristic persons/entities, for alleged wrongful acts.

On 22 December 2015 the supreme court ordered

the subsidiary and related parties to jointly return shares

to the plaintiff; or if such return is not possible, to pay

to the plaintiff the share price at the amount equal to

the trading price of such shares on the date of payment,

plus dividend which the plaintiff should have received,

totaling Baht 318.68 million. As at 31 December 2015,

the subsidiary and related parties were processing

according to the judgment of the supreme court.

The Group has insurance coverage for professional

liability (Financial Institutional Professional Indemnity

Insurance), which covers liability for this case. The

insurance company has confirmed responsibility for the restitution

amount of Baht 106.23 million. The subsidiary did not record

any potential loss in the financial statement for the year ended

31 December 2015 and 2014.

35.2.2.2 On 6 January 2014, the subsidiary was

claimed in a civil lawsuit as joint defendant, together with

other individuals and juristic persons/entities, related to

the performance of certain investment consultants from

member which caused damage to the plaintiff. The plaintiff

was seeking that alleged damages be jointly responsible for

compensation totalling Baht 0.96 million.

As at 31 December 2015, the case was under the

consideration of the supreme court. The outcome of the case

had not been finalised. Therefore, the subsidiary did not record

any potential loss in the financial statements for the year ended

31 December 2015 and 2014.

35.2.2.3 On 30 April 2015, the subsidiary and its

employee were claimed in a civil lawsuit as joint defendants,

together with juristic entities, related to performance of duties

of the subsidiary’s employee which caused damage to the

plaintiff. The plaintiff was seeking that alleged damages be

jointly responsible for compensation totalling Baht 1.48 million.

As at 31 December 2015, the case was under the

consideration of the civil court. The outcome of the case had

not been finalised. Therefore, the subsidiary did not record any

potential loss in the financial statements for the year ended

31 December 2015.