Sustainability Report 2017

17 Performance Evaluation of the BoG and Committees SET’s Committees on Corporate Governance The Committees on Corporate Governance have been assigned by the SET Board of Governors to independently screen, consider and express opinions on governance issues in line with their areas of expertise under the charter of the four committees as follows: Committees Responsibilities Independency Chairman of the Committee Members of the Committee Average meeting attendance Audit Committee To supervise the internal control and monitor the management operations to ensure efficiency and transparency 100% Mrs. Patteera Dilokrungteerapop Mr. Chaipatr Srivisarvacha Dr. Supak Sivarak 96% Selection and Remuneration Committee To consider senior management’s nomination and succession plans and the remuneration of the governors, management and staff 80% Mrs. Patteera Dilokrungteerapop Mr. Chaipatr Srivisarvacha Mrs. Chotika Sawananon Mrs. Worawan Tharabhumi Mrs. Kesara Manchusree 95% Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee To consider policies and guidelines of sustainability management for SET and the capital market 80% Mr. Pichet Sithi-Amnuai Mr. Prinn Panitchpakdi Dr. Somchai Thaisanguanvorakul Dr. Supak Sivarak Mrs. Kesara Manchusree 80% Risk Management Committee To stipulate policies and guidelines of risk management in order to facilitate the continuity and efficiency of the organizational operations 86% Mrs. Patteera Dilokrungteerapop Mr. Pichet Sithi-Amnuai Mrs. Worawan Tharabhumi Mrs. Kesara Manchusree Ms. Wachira Aromdee Mr. Somkiat Sirichartchai Prof. Dr. Anya Khanthavit 92% Assessment of the BoG as a whole Self-assessment and cross-assessment - Performance and responsibilities - Board meetings - Corporate governance and social responsibility - Nomination and succession planning - Duties and responsibilities - Committee meetings - Independence of committee - Qualification and self-development The BoG performance is evaluated at least once a year by the Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Committee who also provides feedback for the evaluation results and additional comments for further development. In 2017, the evaluations were conducted as follows: The four committees are responsible for self-assessment and report the evaluation results to the SET BoG at least once a year. SET discloses the performance evaluation results of the BoG and the Committees in the 2017 Annual Report. The BoG performance evaluation 1) Board performance evaluation as a whole 2) Self-assessment 3) Individual assessment by other governors (cross-assessment) 4) Evaluation of the Chairman’s performance 5) Assessment of skills, knowledge and proficiency of the Governors (102-19) (102-28)